As we dug deeper into
the strata of fill, it became clear that the cultic center, even the
large altar itself, had been preceded by another cultic site. On the
natural bedrock, beneath the geometric center of the altar, we
discovered a round structure, about 6.5 feet in diameter, built of
unhewn stone. It was found full of yellowish material, above which
was a thin layer of ashes and burned animal bones. At first we
thought this was part of the altar. Shortly, however, levels of
habitation preceding the large altar emerged in other parts of the
site as well. Around the early, circular structures were signs of
further cultic activity: an earthen floor paved with pottery, a
large collar-rimmed jar, and other vessels. The pottery findings in
both phases were very similar, so much so that we believe the same
people, or the same generation, built both phases of the site. There
is no difference in the pottery; but, in contrast, there is a
fundamental difference in the perception of the site, which may be
put briefly as follows: in the second half of the 13th century, as
far as we can tell, a modest cultic site was established on Mt.
'Ebal. A rough wall, constructed of large boulders, was built
to enclose a sacred area. In the center was a round structure,
possibly used for sacrifice, and around it other activities took
place.
We do not know the
origins of the great sanctity attributed to the mountain, but it
appears that this sanctity only dates from the time of the Israelite
settlement. For there is not the slightest sign of any Canaanite
cultic tradition, nor any Canaanite finding which dates to the Late
Bronze Age, anywhere on Mt. 'Ebal. It stands to reason that
founding a cultic center on Mt. 'Ebal was intended as nothing
other than a counter-weight to the presence of Canaanite Shechem and
its cultic sites.
After several decades of
the site's existence, a revolutionary change occurred there.
From a small place, sacred to one family or perhaps to the region,
it suddenly became a central cultic site of supra-tribal or perhaps
even national importance to the entire alliance of the tribes. A
new
temenos was built, as well as a broad,
paved gateway. A large and complex
burnt offering altar,
comprised of the platform itself, a surround, a small and a large
ramp, and paved courts, was built on top of the earlier round
structure. When this larger complex was constructed, so it seems to
us today, the remains of bones and ashes from the earlier rites were
gathered together and used to fill the new altar. Burying the
earlier structure in the center of the newer one apparently
symbolized the continuity of the tradition of sanctity attached to
the site.
Many pottery vessels were
discovered on the site, all belonging to the Early Iron Age (the
time of the Israelite settlement, 1250 - 1000 B.C.E). Prominent
types include the
pithos (large
collar-rimmed storage jar), jars, cooking pots, kraters, jugs, and
bowls. Yet what was most interesting was the discovery of two
scarabs (Egyptian-style signet rings in the shape of a beetle,
common in the Ancient Near East throughout the second millenium
B.C.E.). One was found in the altar's fill, the second inside
an offering structure. One displays a geometric design consisting of
a four-petal rosette in the center, with four shoots between the
petals and a uraeus (an Egyptian cobra, believed in Egypt to have
magical powers of protection and holiness) coming out of each shoot.
The other displays a kneeling Egyptian archer and the cartouche of
Thutmosis III, the great Egyptian conqueror. On the basis of similar
findings in Egypt, Canaan and Cyprus, B. Brandl of the Hebrew
University ascribes these scarabs to the second half of the 13th
century B.C.E. In other words, they date
to the time of the great Egyptian pharaoh, Ramses II, who is
considered the pharaoh of the exodus from Egypt. Finding these
scarabs here does not mean they were brought directly from Egypt;
that would be going too far. More important, however, is that they
fix a date for the construction of the altar - approximately
1250 B.C.E.